What I found was that the criminal acts committed by militant individuals during the movement are in fact detailed. After finding this, I have a changed view of what I will argue overall. I realised just how important these crimes were for what the movement achieved, and if this can be taught in schools then why are we trying to erase it in society?
Extracts from the text books:
![]() |
| The Twentieth Century World, Josh Brooman, Longman, 1995 |
![]() |
| Modern Times 1750-1990, Think History, Heinemann, 2004 |
In my dissertation, I will argue that none of the Suffragettes should be pardoned, as this discredits the crimes they knowingly committed. Pardoning them would just be a way of sanitising them, as I initially thought I would find in the text books. Although I did not find what I expected, I think it is still a valuable piece of research for my project, especially as it helped to shape my argument. I would still like to put forward a few individuals who are most suitable for a pardon if it was ever to be considered, but overall I would like to argue no to my question.
From here I would still be interested in finding ways the Suffragettes have been sanitised, as a way of supporting my argument that pardons may also be seen as a way of doing the same.


No comments:
Post a Comment