These are the questions that I considered after watching the documentary:
Consider the viewpoint put forward that their increasing militant activity was partly as a result of the government refusing to change their position?
- Bills put forward were continually rejected by Parliament so it is easy to see why they felt the need to amplify the movement and become more militant, as this was the only way the government may possibly take them seriously.
- Churchill was more concerned with gaining support for his party so focused his attention on those who had the vote, not those who didn't. It clearly wasn't a cause worth considering for those in power.
Where does this leave your views about posthumous pardons?
- Helps to support my argument that they should not be pardoned. Although some crimes that they were charged with are not justified, the acts they committed were still crimes and this was the exact point of the militant movement.
Notes
Table
No comments:
Post a Comment